Verified Document

Hate Crime Laws Give Certain Reaction Paper

It has also been suggested that, in effect, this equality is relatively meaningless, because non-minorities are so much more rarely the victims of hate crimes, and that, therefore, these laws protect and benefit minorities more than they protect or benefit non- minorities. Ironically, the accurate analysis of this observation is precisely backwards:

the fact that minorities are so much more likely to be targeted by racially motivated crimes is hardly a reason to consider the laws that criminalize such conduct "unfair" to non-minorities. If anything, that reality only reinforces the absolute need for laws that prohibit racially motivated crimes. The fact of the matter is that minorities are much more likely to be the victims of racial hatred than are non-minorities, and that non- minorities are more often the perpetrators of racially motivated crimes than are individuals from minority backgrounds. Certainly, there are instances of racially motivated crimes perpetrated by minorities against non-minorities; wherever they occur, those crimes are addressed exactly the same as the reverse situation, exactly as they should be. In any case, the point is actually moot, because, regardless of how often it occurs or what the identity is of perpetrator or victim, the laws specifically addressing racially motivated crimes protect both minorities and non-minorities equally however those crimes occur, or between whom. As far as the...

Even where criminal charges were brought and proof of guilt established beyond doubt at trial, non-minority juries ignored the evidence anytime the defendant was white and the victim black. Ultimately, anti-hate crime legislation is designed to protect everyone equally, not to accomplish the opposite or divide society at all.
References

Dershowitz, a.M. (2002) Shouting Fire: Civil Liberties in a Turbulent Age. Boston: Little Brown

Friedman, L.M. (2005)

History of American Law. New York: Touchstone

Miller, a.R. (1990) Miller's Court. New York: Plume

Schmalleger, F. (1997) Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century. Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Sources used in this document:
References

Dershowitz, a.M. (2002) Shouting Fire: Civil Liberties in a Turbulent Age. Boston: Little Brown

Friedman, L.M. (2005)

History of American Law. New York: Touchstone

Miller, a.R. (1990) Miller's Court. New York: Plume
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now